Improve proposal
parent
2f4e5d7c65
commit
d3b139a0a4
|
@ -26,8 +26,12 @@ Also, when this communication takes place on the blockchain, both the prompt and
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Specification
|
## Specification
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We propose using Zero Knowledge Proofs to show that ???
|
We propose using Zero Knowledge Proofs to show that the output of the model is indeed the result of running the model on the prompt and not
|
||||||
|
some random output. It also makes the gas lower, since the computation is not done on-chain. In the future, we could also use this to make the prompt and the output private.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Users submit requests to the network (eg, a smart contract) regarding what prompt they would like to give to what model and what is the reward.
|
1. Users submit requests to the network (eg, a smart contract) regarding what prompt they would like to give to what model and what is the reward.
|
||||||
1. Other users with strong hardware can fulfill these requests.
|
2. Other users with strong hardware can fulfill these requests.
|
||||||
But instead of sending transactions with
|
But instead of sending transactions with just the output, they also send a Zero Knowledge Proof that the output is indeed the result of running the model on the prompt.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The network would use a native token to reward the users who fulfill the requests, and the users who submit the requests would also have to pay in
|
||||||
|
this token. This way, the network can be self-sustaining.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue