The HODLbag ExoDAO code. NFT: Live || ERC20: Live || DAO: in development.
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
six ad2f5e3006 ExoDAO lib 3 months ago
ExoDAO_skeleton ExoDAO lib 3 months ago
erc20 ExoDAO Skeleton 4 months ago
token_sale_page ERC20 HDL 5 months ago
LICENSE Initial commit 6 months ago Actualize README 4 months ago


The HODLbag DAO code. Current status: NFT: Done, Live || ERC20: Done, Live || DAO: development ongoing.

HODLbag NFT - 0x7abf4604a11f91b1ef4973a7187ffa6c888f5d38

HDL Token - 0x972b6f0070830c9975b70fcf4eca029bbcbfdd53

HODLdao planned events

AirDrop / Referral / PoW bounty

ExoDAO logic draft

Smart contract function <---> Wallet&Provider <---> Provider connect <---> Buttons that call functions and build logic

Smart contract functions with button on frontend:

Mint/Buy NFT Transfer NFT Redeem NFT List NFT tokens

Buy HDL Tokens Send HDL tokens

HODLock Tokens (amount, time)

Create Proposal Standard: title, req. text hash, modifiers values, add fund, fund for if yes) Role prop: title, who (address), what title, fund/salary?) List proposals Vote on proposal (yes/no/reiterate for missing options are fixed, add fund it funded proposal for someone)

Create and set user configuration modifier (how much user supports X is range between 100 and -100) List all personal modifiers with values List all modifiers with values

Roles and permissions? For? Representative can create proposals with hodlbag fund pool as well (dangerous, should have max limit!) Titles (database who is who and responsible for what) Members (members and reps can have titles) Toxic / banned / inappropriate behaviour

Oracle? How do we know if a proposal successfully got done? Example: users decide to make 100 bags to specific people 1. Take money from contract to markers 2. Creation of bags 3. Posting (verify on blockchain for bonus HDL?) 4. Receiver get it - if he verifies receiving, payment to creators finalized and s/he receives bonus for being verifier

Interesting example: